IBMYP Mathematics

IBMYP Mathematics consultancy for stronger ATL, criteria, and progression.

Schools often need more than generic MYP familiarity. They need subject-specific help that tightens curriculum design, criterion-based assessment, ATL integration, and the mathematical journey from the middle years into later DP pathways.

ATL skill progression Criteria A to D MYP to DP continuity Moderation routines

Criterion-based assessment

Sharper task design, more reliable marking, and clearer reporting across criteria A, B, C, and D.

ATL in mathematics

Planning that treats ATL as visible mathematical action rather than a disconnected checklist.

Vertical coherence

Units, concepts, and skill expectations aligned across year levels so progression is easier to teach and easier to see.

Department practice

Coaching, moderation, and review structures grounded in the realities of IBMYP Mathematics classrooms.

IBMYP Mathematics becomes stronger when planning, assessment, and pedagogy move in the same direction.

Many departments have good intentions on paper but still struggle with inconsistent criteria use, vague ATL language, repeated content, or a weak transition into DP.

My work helps schools build a more coherent IBMYP Mathematics programme by tightening curriculum architecture, clarifying assessment expectations, and making moderation conversations more useful.

As an IBEN Programme Leader, school visitor, and experienced examiner, I bring an external perspective that is still close to classroom reality. The goal is practical improvement: clearer units, better assessment, stronger teacher judgment, and a more secure student experience.

Criteria A-D

Balanced task design across knowing, investigating, communicating, and applying mathematics in real contexts.

ATL made visible

Thinking, communication, self-management, and collaboration embedded in mathematical routines and evidence.

MYP to DP

Better continuity in algebraic fluency, reasoning, modelling, and academic independence.

Moderation culture

Stronger shared expectations so criteria interpretation is more consistent across classes and year groups.

Support that is specific to IBMYP Mathematics, not generic programme language.

Departments usually need a combination of curriculum work, assessment design, teacher development, and programme-level thinking.

Curriculum

Curriculum mapping and vertical alignment

Content, concepts, and skill progression mapped deliberately across the programme.

This includes identifying gaps, avoiding unnecessary repetition, and making sure year-level expectations build toward stronger mathematical independence and better later subject choice.

Assessment

Assessment design and criterion-based marking

Tasks that reflect IBMYP Mathematics expectations more accurately.

I help departments refine task design, improve evidence against the criteria, and make criterion-based marking more stable across teachers and classes.

Pedagogy

ATL and inquiry within mathematics

ATL planning connected to mathematical reasoning, communication, and problem solving.

Rather than naming ATL in isolation, I help teams plan where students genuinely develop skills through mathematical investigation, explanation, reflection, and collaborative thinking.

Leadership

Teacher coaching and department review

A clearer picture of what is working and what needs tightening.

Coaching can focus on inquiry, explicit instruction, moderation, unit planning, intervention, or the broader direction of IBMYP Mathematics in the school.

Where departments often need the most subject-specific clarity.

These are the issues that commonly sit underneath underperformance, inconsistent reporting, or weak programme coherence.

ATL that feels authentic in mathematics

Teachers often name ATL well but need stronger planning for how those skills become visible through mathematical habits, discussion, and sustained problem solving.

Criteria interpretation across a team

Even well-intentioned departments can drift in how they read criteria A to D. Shared exemplification and moderation make teacher judgment more trustworthy.

Assessment that is rigorous without becoming distorted

Tasks should preserve conceptual challenge while still producing useful evidence for the criteria. That balance is often where departments need the most support.

Progression from MYP into DP routes

The transition improves when MYP develops secure algebra, communication, resilience, and modelling habits rather than only covering topics at speed.

Bring sharper IBMYP Mathematics practice into the department.

If your school needs support with IBMYP Mathematics curriculum, ATL integration, assessment criteria, moderation, or department development, I work with schools in Switzerland and internationally.

Start the conversation